Why the Order of Controls Is a Legal Requirement
The hierarchy of controls is not a management theory or a best practice framework — it is a legally prescribed order of preference embedded in UK health and safety law. COSHH Regulation 7(1) requires that employers first consider whether exposure can be prevented, and only where prevention is not reasonably practicable do they move to adequate control. This priority structure mirrors the wider principle in Regulation 3 of the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 and the general duty under Section 2 of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974.
Applied to chemical spill prevention specifically, the hierarchy has a direct and well-established structure that every site managing hazardous substances must follow in their COSHH and risk assessments.
Level 1: Elimination
The highest order of control is to eliminate the chemical hazard entirely. For spill prevention, this means:
- Removing the hazardous substance from the workplace entirely
- Redesigning the process so the substance is no longer needed
- Replacing a batch chemical process with a continuous closed-loop system where no dispensing occurs
Elimination is rarely achievable in manufacturing, but it should always be the first question asked. HSE inspectors will ask whether elimination was considered — if it was not documented as considered and rejected with reasoning, the assessment is deficient.
Level 2: Substitution
Where elimination is not reasonably practicable, substitute the hazardous substance with a less hazardous alternative. For spill prevention, substitution reduces the consequence of any spill:
- Replacing a Category 2 flammable solvent with a high-flash alternative (flash point above 60°C) removes the DSEAR zone requirement
- Replacing concentrated acids with dilute preparations reduces splash severity and reduces the required PPE specification
- Using water-based cleaning agents instead of chlorinated solvents reduces both the WEL risk and the hazardous waste classification of spill debris
Substitution must be formally documented in the COSHH assessment, including the substitution decision and confirmation that the replacement substance has been assessed under COSHH in its own right.
Level 3: Engineering Controls — Primary Containment
Where substitution is not reasonably practicable, engineering controls must prevent the release of the substance in the first place. Primary containment engineering controls include:
- Closed-loop dispensing systems with no open vessel handling
- Sealed transfer systems with positive-pressure integrity testing
- Double-skinned tanks with leak detection in the annular space
- Pipework with automatic isolation valves triggered by flow anomalies
- Overfill prevention systems (high-level alarms, automatic shutoff valves)
Level 4: Engineering Controls — Secondary Containment
Where primary containment may fail, secondary containment must capture any release. This is the core of spill containment engineering:
| Control Type | Application | Standard Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Bunded spill pallets | Drum and IBC storage | CIRIA C736; EA PPG2 |
| Bunded flooring | Chemical stores; tank bases | CIRIA C736 |
| Drip trays | Valves; pumps; connection points | COSHH Reg. 7; EA PPG26 |
| Secondary bund walls | Above-ground storage tanks | CIRIA C736; EA PPG2/PPG27 |
| Drain isolation systems | Yard and hardstanding drains | EA PPG3; EPR 2016 |
Level 5: Administrative Controls and Safe Systems of Work
Administrative controls reduce the likelihood of human-error spill events. They include:
- Permit-to-work systems for chemical transfers and maintenance on chemical lines
- Controlled access to chemical storage areas (keyed access; trained personnel only)
- Maximum storage quantity limits displayed and enforced
- Chemical compatibility segregation rules (written procedures; physical separation)
- Pre-transfer checklists for drum and IBC filling operations
- Inspection and testing schedules for primary containment equipment
Administrative controls are accepted by HSE as part of an adequate control package — but only when higher-level engineering controls are also present. Administrative controls alone — posters, written procedures, training — do not constitute adequate control for anything above minimal exposure risk.
Level 6: Personal Protective Equipment
PPE is the last line of defence. Under COSHH Regulation 7(3), PPE shall only be used where exposure cannot be adequately controlled by other means. If your COSHH assessment relies on PPE as the primary control for a high-volatility substance, it will not survive HSE scrutiny. PPE for chemical spill prevention includes:
- Chemical-resistant gloves (specify: EN 374 tested; material and thickness appropriate to substance)
- Face shield and splash goggles (EN 166 standard)
- Chemical-resistant apron or coverall
- Chemical-resistant footwear
Applying the Hierarchy in Practice
The most effective approach is to systematically work down the hierarchy for each identified spill scenario in your COSHH assessment: for each substance, document which elimination/substitution options were considered and rejected (with reasoning), then specify the engineering controls installed, then specify the administrative controls, then specify PPE. This creates a legally defensible assessment that demonstrates the hierarchy has been followed as required by law.
Need expert advice? Call 01744 520 110